The present treatment for post-trauma When I talk to experts in psychotherapy, they almost always admit that there is no efficient treatment for post-trauma, but they recommend a combination of psychiatric medication and psychotherapy, in order to reduce the symptoms. I do not oppose to both points of view.
That is, at least, the end of the road for this recent series of essays detailing the technical contributions of the various major schools of psychotherapy. The present essay is the last scheduled stop for that tour. My last essay titled, "Boundaries and Dysfunctional Family Systems" describing the contributions of the Family Systems school of therapy.
Prior to that we covered behavioral and cognitive behavioral approaches, and two psychoanalytic techniques the analysis of repression and transference. Prior to that, I provided an overview of the various schools of therapy by way of an introduction.
The essay that started this series off in my mind had to do not with therapy technique, but with what are called the non-specific factors — the parts of therapy that have to do with the quality of the therapy relationship and how that relationship promotes growth and healthy development when it is genuine and real.
The behaviorists were engineers, the psychodynamic psychotherapists were philosophers, etc. I called the humanists Gnostics in that little scheme because, as I thought about them and their uniquely personal version of therapy which will shortly be described in some detailit struck me that the Humanistic therapy of war trauma essay therapists shared an ethic with religious gnostic groups who believe that true wisdom become possible only through personal direct experiences and not through the application of dogma.
One way to understand the humanist contribution to psychotherapy is to contrast their approach to therapy with the approaches characteristic of the other major therapy schools. Despite their differences, those other schools of psychotherapy all had in common that they traditionally regarded patients as rather passive beings with problems who required the intervention of experienced expert therapists before they could be expected to get better.
Another way of saying this is that those other schools of therapy have tended to follow the traditional medical model, more or less, in that they saw themselves as treatments for illnesses.
When you see psychotherapy as essentially a treatment for disease, you end up seeing human problems as illness states, patients as passive carriers of illness, and the goal of therapy as one of illness removal. When it first appeared on the scene, late to the game in the s and 60s, the humanist approach to therapy was in stark and revolutionary contrast to the prevalent passive-patient, disease-centric view of mental illness.
The basic motivating idea behind the humanistic approach was that patients were active and responsible beings who participated in creating or at least in maintaining their mental illness states. As active participants in maintaining their own problems, patients could chose to undo some or all of their problems under the right conditions.
Because the humanists saw patients as active and powerful creators and maintainers of their own problems rather than as passive victims of those problems, they necessarily took a different approach to therapy than previous therapists.
The goal of the humanistic therapy became to set up the conditions that would enable patients to choose to help themselves, rather than to require a doctor to administer interventions.
The therapy became person-centered, respecting the power of the person in therapy to choose change or not, rather than technique-centered as previous therapies had been.
The humanistic therapy also began to focus more on helping patients to achieve better general mental health and wellness states and less on removing specific mental illnesses. The humanist vision of active, empowered patients who could cure themselves was founded on a particular set of assumptions about human nature.
The humanist therapists made the assumption that people were for the most part essentially good, or at least neutral beings, and not beings who were essentially evil or sinful.
They also assumed that people were actively involved in constructing and explaining the meaning of events in their lives every second of their lives. This is to say, the humanists took a developmental and largely secular view of human nature.
Humans had instincts and biological drives but not original sin.
|Humanistic Theory - New York Essays||Learning Calm down an agitated person, assisting a friend through a death of a family member, or something as simple as avoiding negative thoughts through distracting, these forms of lending a hand can be described as psychotherapy.|
|Humanistic Theory - Sample Essays||Health Services Administration,|
|Popular Topics||Published by Oxford University Press. The online version of this article has been published under an open access model.|
|Repessed Feelings An Abstact of a Dissetation This study sets out to detemine how deams can be used in a theapeutic envionment to discuss feelings fom a deam, and how the theapist should engage the patient to discuss them to eveal the elevance of those feelings, in thei pesent, waking life. It also discusses the meaning of epetitious deams, how medication affects the content of a deame's deams, and if theapists actually "guide" thei clients in what to say.|
They were meaning making creatures whose capacity for meaning making evolved over time. They could either develop into the good and healthy people they were designed to become by God or evolution, makes no difference or alternatively, to have their development derailed by abuse, neglect or accident of some sort and end up less than healthy or outright dysfunctional.
By helping patients to resume their derailed developmental processes in healthy directions, patients are helped to grow up and out of the immature mental and emotional states that cause them to be in pain themselves and to inflict pain upon others.
Rogerian therapy makes the therapist out to be a sort of gardener, you might say, and the patient into a sort of plant that the gardener will be tending.
If the gardener can help place the plant into the right soil and give it the proper water and light, that plant will very likely start to grow. But patients are like plants in that if they are planted and cared for well e.Humanistic Psychotherapy.
Mark Dombeck, Ph.D.
The present essay is the last scheduled stop for that tour. The humanistic therapy also began to focus more on helping patients to achieve better general mental health and wellness states and less on removing specific mental illnesses.
A goal of humanistic theory and therapy gives the client the opportunity to deal with their behavior and situation in their own terms of real self and ideal self. With this idea, a client’s progress and direction in the therapy is based from what they are and what they want. Psychoanalytic therapy, Humanistic therapy, Behavior therapy, Cognitive therapy, Group therapy, and Biological therapy are all effective therapeutic methods of .
In essence, humanistic therapists attempt to create a warm and accepting therapeutic relationship to actualize a health direction.
(Hoffman, L., et al. ). Objective of this paper is to discuss the theory of Existential Humanistic Therapy, and apply the interventions/concepts . Humanistic Treatment Of War Trauma Essay College Paper Service Veterans Introduction Largepr. Uploaded. at Thursday, September 27th AM under Essay .
Humanistic Therapy. By Michael Hurst. The development of humanistic therapy occurred in the mids, and is often referred to as the “third wave” or “third force,” following Freudian psychoanalysis and behaviorism.
The term “humanistic therapy” has also been used as a general category that includes client-centered therapy, existential therapy and gestalt mtb15.comon: Stevens Creek Blvd Suite , Cupertino, , CA.